Relationships between university students’ temporal perceptions of affective and cognitive attributes of academic performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2023.1717Keywords:
Cognitive process, affectivity, time factor, performance appreciationAbstract
Introduction: The variations of the intentional monitoring carried out by university students on attributes and temporalities of complex learning are analyzed. Objective: to identify the structural relationships between affective and cognitive attributes considered at different times of performance in two tasks of academic skills. Method: intentional sample of 420 students of Higher Education of Mexico and Colombia, of both sexes, answered: a) an inventory of the self-report on variations in attributes and temporal moments in two different tasks and b) two tests, one of comprehension of texts and another of mathematical skills. The theoretical models underlying the assumed academic performance were validated, empirically, through path analysis. Results: high rates of practical fit in all models, which allows identifying differential influences depending on the temporal condition in which the attributes operate, retrospective in the affective and concurrent in the cognitive. Discussion: the findings configure theoretical advances on the impact of temporality on the dispositions that students must show to act intentionally (that is, to be endowed with agency), in order to generate the transformations that their goals demand. These can serve as efficient markers for diagnostic artifacts, as well as for didactic procedures in the service of expert development.
References
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Beck, B., Di Costa, S. & Haggard, P. (2017). Having control over the external world increases the implicit sense of agency. Cognition, 162, 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.002
Boekaerts, M. (1995). The interface between intelligence and personality as determinants of classroom learning. En D. H. Sakolfske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence (pp. 161-183). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8_9
Borges, J. L. (1946). Los dos reyes y los dos laberintos. Aleph. Losada.
Broncano, F. (2014). Daring to Believe: Metacognition, Epistemic Agency and Reflective Knowledge. En A. Fairweather (Ed.), Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Syntheses Library (Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science), (Vol. 366, pp. 49-66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_4
Byrne, B. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press.
Castañeda, S. (1996). Interfase afectivo–motivacional en la comprensión de textos: estudio transcultural México–Holanda. Revista Latina de Pensamiento y Lenguaje, 4(2), 169–185. https://tinyurl.com/y5m49gbr
Castañeda, S. (2009). Los puntajes de egreso: ¿certifican lo acreditado en los currícula? En Z. Monroy & R. León (Eds.), Epistemología, psicología y enseñanza de la ciencia (pp. 127-147). UNAM. https://tinyurl.com/4vdm2fdp
Castañeda, S. (2012). El sentido de agencia en el aprendizaje de contenidos teóricos. XX Congreso Mexicano de Psicología. Campeche, México.
Castañeda, S. & López, M. (1989). Antología. La psicología cognoscitiva del aprendizaje. Aprendiendo a aprender. UNAM.
Castañeda, S. & Peñalosa, E. (Eds.). (2016). Fenomenología de agencia académica. UAM.
Castañeda, S. & Peñalosa, E. (Eds.). (2018). Derivación tecnológica en apoyo a la agencia académica en educación superior. UAM-UNAM.
Castañeda, S., Peñalosa, E. & Austria, F. (2014). Perfiles agentivos y no agentivos en la formación del psicólogo. UNAM.
Castañeda, S., Peñalosa, E. & Peña, R. (2021). El docente y la mediación de los nuevos capitales culturales en la educación terciaria: Desde el enfoque de agencia académica. UAM.
Cervone, D. (2005). Personality architecture: Within-person structure and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423-452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070133
Chambon, V., Filevich, E. & Haggard, P. (2014). What is the human sense of agency, and is it metacognitive? En S. Fleming & C. Frith (Eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_14
Clore, G. L., Schiller, A. J. & Shaked, A. (2018). Affect and cognition: three principles. Current Opinion in Behavioural Sciences, 19, 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.11.010
Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and built. En P. Devine, & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances on experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1-53). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.
George, D. & Mallory, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 Update. Estados Unidos: Ally & Bacon.
Gómez, M. (2006). Introducción a la metodología de la investigación científica. Editorial Brujas.
González, N. L, Tejeda, A. A., Espinosa, C. M. & Ontiveros, Z. O. (2020). Impacto psicológico en estudiantes universitarios mexicanos por confinamiento durante la pandemia por Covid-19. Scielo Preprints. https://
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rodrigo Peña Durán Rodrigo Peña Durán, Sandra Castañeda Figueiras Sandra Castañeda Figueiras, Iván Leonardo Pérez Cabrera Iván Leonardo Pérez Cabrera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
